For a long time, the National Association of Teachers of Singing (NATS), which is the largest organization of singing teachers in the world, only encouraged classical and operatic styles of singing. There were many members who were convinced that singing in any other genre (jazz, pop, and *gasp* musical theatre!) was inherently unhealthy and anyone undertaking such risky behavior was on the path to vocal ruin.
Although there are some folks who still believe this, their numbers are diminishing, in part because organizations like NATS have done an about face. NATS now wholeheartedly embraces the fact that all genres of music can be performed in healthy and expressive ways when appropriate, style-specific techniques are taught.
To help lead the charge of change, NATS has sponsored the So You Want to Sing series of books dedicated to promoting the styles and techniques of non-classical genres. The first book in the series is So You Want to Sing Music Theater. The last book—the twentieth—is called So You Want to Sing Cabaret, which I'm currently reading. I'm learning quite a bit about what distinguishes true cabaret from other genres and how it can be performed authentically. For instance, a cabaret is NOT just standing on stage and singing through a list of your favorite musical theatre songs. Even so, there is still a lot of crossover between cabaret singing and musical theatre singing. Many of the best-known composers of the songs in The Great American Songbook, which are often used in cabaret performances, are also musical theatre composers (Cole Porter, the Gershwins, Rodgers and Hart, etc.).
One distinguishing factor of cabaret, however, is the primacy of text. As stated by authors David Sabella and Sue Matsuki:
"The voice must remain in service to the lyric at all costs. At all costs!...Professional use of the voice dictates that there is no correct sound. The right sound is simply the best sound for the story you are telling, which is not necessarily the prettiest sound you can make... It is not a dangerous or unsafe sound, to be sure. It is simply the sound that best communicates the lyric and aids in storytelling." (p.121)
We could argue that this should hold true in musical theatre, as well, and I think that most of the time it does. But there are some realities of the genre that may prevent a truly lyric-driven performance 100% of the time. For instance, cabaret performance venues are generally small and intimate. Even so, the singers perform with a hand-held microphone, not so much to be heard but to allow for a wider variety of vocal sounds and dynamics. Musical theatre venues are often much larger and can involve large orchestras instead of small combos. Although actors in musicals also sing with microphones, the mics are usually taped to the singers' faces at a fixed distance. This helps amplify the sound but doesn't allow individual actors to get closer or farther away from the mic for expressive purposes.
That being said, we often spend so much time trying to create beautiful vocal sounds that we sometimes forget that, in a text-first genre like theatre, the most expressive and appropriate sound may not always be the most beautiful sound. Characters who are emotionally devastated or who are infuriated are probably unlikely to express themselves with perfectly balanced chiaroscuro tones. As Sabella and Matsuki say, that doesn't mean you should aim to make unhealthy or unsustainable sounds. But the reason we build vocal technique is so that we have as wide a range of vocal colors as possible so that we are better equipped to express the full gamut of emotional states our characters experience. If we only build the "pretty" sounds, we're limiting our options.
In summarizing their thoughts on the topic, the authors pose this question:
"Are you willing to sacrifice that which, through ardent vocal training, you have previously perceived as 'correct,' such as beauty of tone or range, in favor of lyric delivery and believability should the storytelling warrant it?" (p.121)
As we prepare for vocal juries and class finals, you may start taking a deeper look at your tonal goals. While staying within the bounds of good vocal health, see if there are places in your songs where beautiful sounds may actually detract from the story or the character. And then dare to be more beast than beauty.
Now go practice.
I'm really intrigued by what these 20 books have to say. I love that it is clearly stated about cabaret that it is meant to serve the story FIRST and the ears SECOND. Or at least that's the way I understood it. I've personally been in the play where I want to make the prettiest or most pleasing sound and that is definitely the reason I have personally paid the price for how that has destroyed my vice. I also love the fact that the books refer to making sounds that are healthy for your voice and yourself rather than what we hear. This is something I am hearing more and more and I'm so glad to be in a such health minded culture.
ReplyDeleteLuke Morton
I love this idea, even though it is something difficult for me to execute on some of the time. For example, I have worked so hard to perfect my vibrato, that I find it very hard to eliminate that vocal element when the story calls for it. Sometimes, I can feel my body physically resisting when I try to remove my vibrato-a demonstration of how closely tied our minds and bodies really are.
ReplyDeleteOne of the key take-aways from Studio (and voice lessons!) for me has been about serving the character. An authentic performance devoid of selfishness will include less of "you" and more of you inhabiting a character. So, it isn't about what kind of sounds you LOVE to make, it is about the sounds that suits the character you are serving.
I totally agree with serving the story over the voice. I see this often when I watch musicals, most of the time people are showboating and trying to make their voice sound as pretty as they can. That doesn't amount to very good acting or vocal work. Thats a place where a lot of musicals lose me. I want to hear your characters story and see their journey. The point where we lose acting/vocalizing is when we try to preform instead of just being.
ReplyDelete-jimi
I believed, when I was young, that in order to be a good singer you just had to have a pretty voice. It wasn't until later in life when I became more informed about the importance of music. I do now understand that the importance of a song, especially in musical theatre, comes from how it is sung and conveyed, rather than just sounding good or "correct". I am personally willing to, with the intent of preserving my voice, sing in any way that will serve the story and lyrics before the need to sound good.
ReplyDeleteThis was an interesting entry. I've never considered to try and make ugly sound, usually, its frowned upon or dismissed when doing so. I may not sing as well as most of my peers, but I always try to make any song I sing pretty and sound really good, because that's what I've taught to do, which I have found not to work all the time. Some songs are meant to be sand softly and beautifully, but that concept can't always work for all songs and I just had an epiphany reading this blog, that even ugly sounds can form to something beautiful and make it work. I'm going to try this next time when I sing a song, I want to experiment sounds that work for my tone of voice and the way my vocal folds vibrate to match what I'm singing. I think this idea could really help me vocal wise, get a variety of different tones than what I am used!
ReplyDelete-Debora Ingabile
I found this blog very intriguing! I am 100% the person that focuses TOO heavy on the vocal tone, even when it doesn’t serve the text as clearly. I think I’ve drilled it into my head in the early stages of practice the exactness of the notes and at a tone that sounds and feels good to me. I need to make sure that I am doing proper text work BEFORE this stage to make sure that the story isn’t being swept aside. I also like the idea that different styles ask for different things of the singer. Clearly we should have a different approach to a jazz song than we would to a classical song. My voice naturally tends to take on very jazz-like croon-ness, which can be useful in some songs, but I have to be conscious about when it is inappropriate for some songs (looking at you “Everybody Says Don’t”). I need to make sure my vocal choices are conscious and deliberate to make sure I am staying true to the style I am singing!
ReplyDelete-Caleb Hunt
This blog really got my gears turning, because I feel like sometimes, I do focus too much on my technique that I forget to tell the story behind the words I'm singing. And I need to remind myself that it is okay to sound "ugly" sometimes, especially when the song calls for it. As long as we are singing healthily and nothing hurts vocally, then anything should be fair game as to what is considered 'good singing.' There are many different ways to sing; it's just a matter of deciding what the best way is for a particular song.
ReplyDeleteFor so long I have been terrified of "sounding bad." However, I have become very frustrated with this fear of not producing a "pretty sound" which is not why I love to sing. Singing offers an additional emphasis on text when a melody is added. The character's soul is illuminated when I sing. I don't speak to "sound good," I speak to convey a thought, a feeling, a discovery. I sing to be; to act--not to shove myself into a small box of what has been defined as "good singing." What is "good" is subjective. Why spend my efforts on conformity rather than creativity within song?
ReplyDeleteAs someone who grew up thinking they could not sing, I love this paradigm, and I wonder, if I've just been singing the wrong songs. Of course, it was only this semester that I've really learned what healthy singing is and how it feels, so I'm still working on maintaining technique. But it's very freeing to focus on whether the sound feels good instead of sounds good. While both are important, I feel like it's okay to let go of perfection and make sure my instrument is healthy before trying to always have the perfect pitch all the time.
ReplyDeleteIsabelle Siebeneck
DeleteI’ve always been drawn to music/singing where the text, the story, is featured and the voice and instrumentation is there to support that. Yet, it wasn’t until this semester that I heard other people saying the same thing. I have always been a sucker for words and how even a limited vocabulary can be expressed in a variety of ways to color an experience. I’ve always found what people would consider “ugly” voices some of the most interesting but with my limited experience of musical theatre I didn’t find, or more accurately, hear, the equivalent cross over until now. What I’ve learned this semester has helped me to see singing as less exclusive and intimidating, and more approachable and useful as a tool for storytellers.
ReplyDeleteI know that I when I first get a song, I really try and get a beautiful sound. I think that has to do with because I am hyperaware of what is going on in my voice and placement. But I am really interested in these books and exploring other genres of singing, because I think I would benefit from reading about the styles and different techniques since I am so literal in that sense. But I think that having Alex and Eric teaching Studio I, has really taught me that it doesn't always need to sound beautiful and perfect because the story matters more, and having a rawness to some songs actually helps in the story telling.
ReplyDeleteI used to believe good singers were good simply because they were born with a good voice. Although often times that is the case, I now believe that with good training you’re able to achieve what you consider good singing. I also believe that in order to tell a story, specially in musicals, you need your singing to also be part of that journey. Otherwise, it won’t be as powerful.
ReplyDeleteLately, I’ve been trying to apply this into my singing when it’s time to perform in front of class. At first, I was more focused on not having my voice crack. But now that I’m feeling more comfortable singing in front of others, I’m focusing more on what my story is, and on what journey I want to take the audience to.
-Kirsten Henriquez
I enjoyed reading about the value and emphasis of varying genres of singing and tonal qualities. I also like the idea of letting go of feeling the need to sound pretty simply because life isn't always pretty. If, as performers, we only try to sound overly pristine, the humanity and wide range of emotions we all possess disappears. On the flip-side, if a person dares to be ugly for the sake of serving the story, they are not being a self-indulgent performer. This concept innately supports the idea that it's easy to be a self-indulgent performer if you're not careful.
ReplyDelete-Caroline Ciet
I liked reading about how training your voice to only make beautiful sounds is limiting. I have been slowly increasing my range and pushing myself out of my comfort zone with the sounds I choose to make. My favorite performances to watch are those that are full of emotion and raw singing. Especially in musical theatre, I would rather watch a performance that had imperfections that fit the character rather than someone singing perfectly. I thought it was really interesting how you talked about sounds being appropriate and expressive with the character in mind. Performers can communicate a lot about their character simply by the sounds and gestures they choose to make during a performance.
ReplyDeleteWhile 20 books is too much for me personally, I appreciate the bits you’ve included here in this blog! I definitely think I am one who struggles with only wanting to work on my “pretty” sounds. After thinking about this topic and my voice I don’t even think it would be crazy to say I work on the beautiful sounds, rather the ones that sound best in my ear, and I’m an awful judge of what sounds great and what doesn’t. I plan to take a deeper dive into the texts of my songs so as when we get to my jury I can really give a good vocal performance that brings people in with the text alone, and I can give a good demonstration of acting without moving around a shit load.
ReplyDelete-Tate Foshay
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Brian! I want to start off by saying that I love the title of this blog! Is it a reference to The Beauty Is? Also I like that you mentioned how a lot of people consider vocal styles other than classical to be “on the path of vocal ruin.” The music world is filled with people who like to cling onto tradition that they don’t see all the great new music and material coming out today! I totally agree with what you’re saying about how musical theatre, sometimes the prettiest sound isn’t appropriate. Sometimes we need that vulnerability to show through the singing. In regards to text-first songs, the first that comes to mind is Meadowlark and I’m Coming Out of My Shell. Both songs generally sit in my talking and lower register so I have to focus on getting the story out rather than a pretty sound.
ReplyDeleteI love this blog post as it is something that I am continuously working on. As I have grown up through theater, I have continuously been taught to focus more energy on sounding good then whatever story I was telling through my performance. However, I have begun to realize as I have grown older, that the whole purpose of theater and musical performances is to serve justice to the story you are telling. In turn, putting your attention on the story and how that may affect your vocals can serve your job as an artist better to relay the story from a place of honesty and truthfulness. I love the quote, “The right sound is simply the best sound for the story you are telling, which is not necessarily the prettiest sound you can make.” It is something I will continue to work on.
ReplyDelete-CoCo Berwald
For this blog I really thought about my own singing. When I sing, I tend to go full volume all of the time and never sing quietly or rarely. I feel in my own head that when I sing softly others can't hear me and as such I avoid it as much as I can and sing louder. This leads to me being at full voice almost all of the time and probably means I don't sing as healthy as I should. I'm working on finding variation and singing a little less loudly and not at full volume all of the time. I have work to do on it for sure but I won't stop till I figure out how to sing quietly without feeling that I can't be heard.
ReplyDelete--- Matthew Jbara
I love this insight! I think it's really interesting to ponder the balance between emotional singing and healthy singing. In my experience, the uglier sounds in my singing come with high emotion singing, but I need to be mindful that my vocal health is of the utmost importance. I definitely need to trust myself more that my voice will sound the way it is meant to sound, and the focus should be on conveying the message of the song. Also the idea that limiting your vocal training to what sounds pretty is coming from a place of fear, and you can't grow if you're afraid of messing up or sounding bad. Just a few thoughts! :)
ReplyDeleteI find it interesting that there are so many aspects of musical theater in which you must be proficient in both ends of the spectrum. Like the example this book gives, we train to have perfect sounds and pretty notes, but we also must be able to throw that out when story dictates we should. We study ballet to be strong and sturdy but need to be ready to throw that out when doing something contemporary that requires more loose and free feeling movement. I think it is important not to get lost in trying to be perfect vocally all the time, as performers were there to tell the story first, by any means necessary.
ReplyDeleteJosh w
*we’re
DeleteAfter reading this blog, I realized how much musical theatre I have seen and witnessed and how much the actors were really engaged in it. I grew up thinking and feeling that I could never sing or be good at it. I now feel more confident in my abilities and in my voice in acting. Many people in musical theatre try to show off their voice and performance without ever realizing how important and crucial voice is for character and story telling. Without proper use of the voice it just takes me out of the whole experience. A character's voice is one of their most defining features and many characters have imperfect and strange voices which make it all the more interesting, entertaining, and in depth.
ReplyDelete-Tyler Kline
I really like what this Blog talks about. I think it is crucial to find the levels in voice to make sure that we continue to progress as performers. Lessons are going well but like you say sometimes we need to make sure that we look at the way we interpret the character.
ReplyDeleteAlex Fish
I can think of specific performers that focus too much on the "pretty sound" rather than the "right sound" that the book is talking about. It's something that's so obvious but so many people (including myself) miss a lot of the time. If you're acting and singing at the same time not all the sounds are gonna be pretty. But it's easy to fall into unhealthy habits by thinking that just because a sound "feels" right that it's automatically healthy.
ReplyDelete-Myles Davis
Hi Brian! I really liked this blog! I’m definitely someone who focuses greatly on having a “pretty sound.” I’ve spent a lot of time trying to sound the way I think it’s the most aesthetically pleasing but I’ve recently come to realize that lyrics also hold so much power. It’s taken me a while but now I do see that you need a combination of both. I’ve started trying to shift gears and focus a bit more on the material and what exactly it’s saying. I think I’m doing a better job at letting that drive the story though it’s still something I struggle with sometimes. I will definitely continue to work on that and improve as much as I can. While I want to try and produce the prettiest sound I can most of the time, sometimes moments in a song don’t call for that and that needs to be paid attention to as well.
ReplyDeleteI had to let go of the obsession with sounding good for my last studio piece in dem lab, and I think when I am able to do that, I have more successful performances. I am always "watching myself" perform, and trying to sound good feeds into that, so I am trying to stop doing that.
ReplyDeleteJT Kaufman